<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for TacticalGearReview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>The place for all things tactical</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on NiteCore EZ AA by Owls</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/2009/05/nitecore-ez-aa/comment-page-1/#comment-95533</link>
		<dc:creator>Owls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/?p=147#comment-95533</guid>
		<description>We were back in the woods, and my girlfriend lit up her led headlamp that had one of Newton’s telescopic focus lens on it.  The light went way off into the woods.   She was proud of the throw on her new toy.

I loaded up a Nitecore Ez AA R1, with an Aw 14500 for power.  The next time we were in a clearing, dark of night, about 50 yards to the surrounding trees.    Her batteries must have been worn, but as soon as I went on high she remarked, that it was a  bright light.  She knows lights.  She asked where I got it, I said it was just an old key chain light.  Which was true, I did not say how old, about a week She took a very close look...  

When she drove off, in her old Toyota her lights were so weak, that the Nitecore’s  lighting up the clearing, and reflecting off of the trees, overpowered her headlights.  The road was lit so much by the hired aimed key chain light, that the car was plunged into relative darkness when she drove through the curve that led out of the clearing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were back in the woods, and my girlfriend lit up her led headlamp that had one of Newton’s telescopic focus lens on it.  The light went way off into the woods.   She was proud of the throw on her new toy.</p>
<p>I loaded up a Nitecore Ez AA R1, with an Aw 14500 for power.  The next time we were in a clearing, dark of night, about 50 yards to the surrounding trees.    Her batteries must have been worn, but as soon as I went on high she remarked, that it was a  bright light.  She knows lights.  She asked where I got it, I said it was just an old key chain light.  Which was true, I did not say how old, about a week She took a very close look&#8230;  </p>
<p>When she drove off, in her old Toyota her lights were so weak, that the Nitecore’s  lighting up the clearing, and reflecting off of the trees, overpowered her headlights.  The road was lit so much by the hired aimed key chain light, that the car was plunged into relative darkness when she drove through the curve that led out of the clearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NiteCore EZ AA Review by Owls</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/2009/06/nitecore-ez-aa-review/comment-page-1/#comment-95508</link>
		<dc:creator>Owls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/?p=199#comment-95508</guid>
		<description>We were back in the woods, and my girlfriend lit up her led headlamp that had one of Newton’s telescopic focus lens on it.  The light went way off into the woods.   She was proud of the throw on her new toy.

I loaded up an Ez R1with 14500 power.  The next time we were in a clearing, dark of night, of less than 100 yards to the surrounding trees.    Her batteries must have been worn, but as soon as I went on high she remarked, that was a  bright light.  She asked where I got it, I said it was just an old key chain light.  Which was true, I did not say how old.  She took a very close look.  When she drove off, the headlights on the old Toyota was so weak, that the Nitecore, overpowered them lighting up the clearing and reflecting off of the trees.  The road was lit so much by the key chain light, that she was plunged into relative darkness when she passed out of the clearing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were back in the woods, and my girlfriend lit up her led headlamp that had one of Newton’s telescopic focus lens on it.  The light went way off into the woods.   She was proud of the throw on her new toy.</p>
<p>I loaded up an Ez R1with 14500 power.  The next time we were in a clearing, dark of night, of less than 100 yards to the surrounding trees.    Her batteries must have been worn, but as soon as I went on high she remarked, that was a  bright light.  She asked where I got it, I said it was just an old key chain light.  Which was true, I did not say how old.  She took a very close look.  When she drove off, the headlights on the old Toyota was so weak, that the Nitecore, overpowered them lighting up the clearing and reflecting off of the trees.  The road was lit so much by the key chain light, that she was plunged into relative darkness when she passed out of the clearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Burris AR-332™ Prism Sight by armydan</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/2009/05/burris-ar-332%e2%84%a2-prism-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-93991</link>
		<dc:creator>armydan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 03:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/?p=137#comment-93991</guid>
		<description>Can't wait to get one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait to get one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Buckshot&#8217;s Intro, Part 2 by Buckshot</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/2009/06/buckshots-intro-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-92895</link>
		<dc:creator>Buckshot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 06:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/?p=164#comment-92895</guid>
		<description>WOW!

Someone read some of my rambling.

Thanks!

In this specific case I would advise keeping the pepper spray in the strong hand (more trained in fine motor skills like pointing the pepper spray) and defend with the weak hand, which is NOT really weak, just less skilled in fine motor operations.

Generally the "weak" hand is the stronger "smash and bash" hand while the "strong hand" automatically protects itself more to maintain those fine motor skills.

If you observe people they will usually use the non-dominant hand for power but no finess activities and the dominant hand for finess with less power activities.

This is why a lot of right handed boxers have a LOT of power in their left hook!

Buckshot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!</p>
<p>Someone read some of my rambling.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>In this specific case I would advise keeping the pepper spray in the strong hand (more trained in fine motor skills like pointing the pepper spray) and defend with the weak hand, which is NOT really weak, just less skilled in fine motor operations.</p>
<p>Generally the &#8220;weak&#8221; hand is the stronger &#8220;smash and bash&#8221; hand while the &#8220;strong hand&#8221; automatically protects itself more to maintain those fine motor skills.</p>
<p>If you observe people they will usually use the non-dominant hand for power but no finess activities and the dominant hand for finess with less power activities.</p>
<p>This is why a lot of right handed boxers have a LOT of power in their left hook!</p>
<p>Buckshot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ruger LCP vs Kahr PM9: The Tale of the Tape by Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/2009/05/ruger-lcp-vs-kahr-pm9-the-tale-of-the-tape/comment-page-1/#comment-92880</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/?p=121#comment-92880</guid>
		<description>I have owned a Kahr K9 and carried it since new for 13 years, It was recently stolen and I purchased a PM9. I dont own an LCP, but I can honestly say that Kahr Arms makes good quality guns. They are up there with Glock, Sig etc. They are both comfortable to shoot. But the K9 has less recoil and is more comfortable to shoot than the PM9. Dam, I miss my K9.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have owned a Kahr K9 and carried it since new for 13 years, It was recently stolen and I purchased a PM9. I dont own an LCP, but I can honestly say that Kahr Arms makes good quality guns. They are up there with Glock, Sig etc. They are both comfortable to shoot. But the K9 has less recoil and is more comfortable to shoot than the PM9. Dam, I miss my K9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Buckshot&#8217;s Intro, Part 2 by Pepper Spray</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/2009/06/buckshots-intro-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-92625</link>
		<dc:creator>Pepper Spray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/?p=164#comment-92625</guid>
		<description>Good advice. I always tell my wife to practice holding the pepper spray in her weak hand so that she has her strong hand to help fight away an attacker in case they get too close. Most people automatically grab the pepper spray with their strong hand and try to push away an attacker with the pepper spray in their hand. That does not do any good. So practice holding the pepper spray in your weak hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good advice. I always tell my wife to practice holding the pepper spray in her weak hand so that she has her strong hand to help fight away an attacker in case they get too close. Most people automatically grab the pepper spray with their strong hand and try to push away an attacker with the pepper spray in their hand. That does not do any good. So practice holding the pepper spray in your weak hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ruger LCP vs Kahr PM9: The Tale of the Tape by FPB</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/2009/05/ruger-lcp-vs-kahr-pm9-the-tale-of-the-tape/comment-page-1/#comment-92262</link>
		<dc:creator>FPB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/?p=121#comment-92262</guid>
		<description>I don't own a Ruger LCP...yet!  But to answer you question about the dangling pinky, you get use to it when you practice with it.  I own a Glock 26 and I love it.  I practice handling the gun and dry firing, and of course I go to the range and practice shooting it as well.  You get just as good shooting it with it if you had all fingers on the gun.  The 26 is a joy to shoot, and I carry it about 50% of the time with a SmartCarry holster.  I want a gun I can take with me while I go for a run or bike.  I also feel that I will that I will carry it in my pocket the other 50% of the time I don't want to take the 26.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t own a Ruger LCP&#8230;yet!  But to answer you question about the dangling pinky, you get use to it when you practice with it.  I own a Glock 26 and I love it.  I practice handling the gun and dry firing, and of course I go to the range and practice shooting it as well.  You get just as good shooting it with it if you had all fingers on the gun.  The 26 is a joy to shoot, and I carry it about 50% of the time with a SmartCarry holster.  I want a gun I can take with me while I go for a run or bike.  I also feel that I will that I will carry it in my pocket the other 50% of the time I don&#8217;t want to take the 26.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ruger LCP vs Kahr PM9: The Tale of the Tape by Ruger LCP</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/2009/05/ruger-lcp-vs-kahr-pm9-the-tale-of-the-tape/comment-page-1/#comment-92124</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruger LCP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 04:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/?p=121#comment-92124</guid>
		<description>How do you feel about having your pinky finger dangle off the bottom of the Ruger LCP?  I can't get used to it coming from full size pistols.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you feel about having your pinky finger dangle off the bottom of the Ruger LCP?  I can&#8217;t get used to it coming from full size pistols.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ruger LCP vs Kahr PM9: The Tale of the Tape by DP</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/2009/05/ruger-lcp-vs-kahr-pm9-the-tale-of-the-tape/comment-page-1/#comment-92008</link>
		<dc:creator>DP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/?p=121#comment-92008</guid>
		<description>I own both guns along with a Glock 23.  I started with the LCP.  It is a fine little gun and I will throw it in a front pocket if I am dressed up.  I am not crazy about shooting this little guy but having it on me is better then nothing at all.  My primary carry is the Kahr PM9.  It rides very nice in a front pocket with my jean shorts and I feel a little better of the stopping power.  It is very dependable after the first 200 rounds and not bad to shoot at the range.  Finally, I have a Glock 23.  This is my up north gun.  I carry it when up north on the weekends goofing off.  It is a dream to shoot at the range and not hard to conceal in casual clothing.  

Kahr  On me 60% of the time
Glock On me 25% of the time
Ruger On me 15% of the time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own both guns along with a Glock 23.  I started with the LCP.  It is a fine little gun and I will throw it in a front pocket if I am dressed up.  I am not crazy about shooting this little guy but having it on me is better then nothing at all.  My primary carry is the Kahr PM9.  It rides very nice in a front pocket with my jean shorts and I feel a little better of the stopping power.  It is very dependable after the first 200 rounds and not bad to shoot at the range.  Finally, I have a Glock 23.  This is my up north gun.  I carry it when up north on the weekends goofing off.  It is a dream to shoot at the range and not hard to conceal in casual clothing.  </p>
<p>Kahr  On me 60% of the time<br />
Glock On me 25% of the time<br />
Ruger On me 15% of the time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ruger LCP vs Kahr PM9: The Tale of the Tape by hindi</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/2009/05/ruger-lcp-vs-kahr-pm9-the-tale-of-the-tape/comment-page-1/#comment-91779</link>
		<dc:creator>hindi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/?p=121#comment-91779</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure size and weight are the only things to consider with these guns. Kahr can use 9mm +p+ ammo. The LCP cannot use anything but standard ammo. Keep in mind the value of a Good Buffalo bore 9mm+p+ at 1300+ fps. Also I'm not sure the LCP is meant for heavy use. Its basically a clone of the kel-tec P-3at with Rugers name engraved on the side. When my dealer handed me both they looked like they came out of the same womb. The kel-tec has a service life of only 6000 rounds. Thats why I'm not too sure about the Ruger yet.  

Basically, If you want to have a gun that shoots a better cartridge and will last a long time with little repair or replacement get the Kahr. If your not gonna use the LCP for practice much and need the comfort carry of a gun that looks smaller and feels a lot lighter get the LCP. You'll save more money with the LCP also, but that may be because they built it as a light weight 6000 round throw away gun. Though i could be wrong about that. Holding the keltec and the lcp in each hand and examining them makes me consider that they both may have the same service life. 

Truthfully, I am having this same problem, I can't decide between a heavier gun and the LCP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure size and weight are the only things to consider with these guns. Kahr can use 9mm +p+ ammo. The LCP cannot use anything but standard ammo. Keep in mind the value of a Good Buffalo bore 9mm+p+ at 1300+ fps. Also I&#8217;m not sure the LCP is meant for heavy use. Its basically a clone of the kel-tec P-3at with Rugers name engraved on the side. When my dealer handed me both they looked like they came out of the same womb. The kel-tec has a service life of only 6000 rounds. Thats why I&#8217;m not too sure about the Ruger yet.  </p>
<p>Basically, If you want to have a gun that shoots a better cartridge and will last a long time with little repair or replacement get the Kahr. If your not gonna use the LCP for practice much and need the comfort carry of a gun that looks smaller and feels a lot lighter get the LCP. You&#8217;ll save more money with the LCP also, but that may be because they built it as a light weight 6000 round throw away gun. Though i could be wrong about that. Holding the keltec and the lcp in each hand and examining them makes me consider that they both may have the same service life. </p>
<p>Truthfully, I am having this same problem, I can&#8217;t decide between a heavier gun and the LCP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NiteCore EZ AA Review by Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/2009/06/nitecore-ez-aa-review/comment-page-1/#comment-91217</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/?p=199#comment-91217</guid>
		<description>Hi. Fine review. It seems the NiteCore EZ AA would be more than adequate for illuminating those small confined spaces where you would tend to use such a small light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. Fine review. It seems the NiteCore EZ AA would be more than adequate for illuminating those small confined spaces where you would tend to use such a small light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on STAY ALERT CAFFEINE GUM by Kate Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/2005/07/stay-alert-caffeine-gum/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/?p=34#comment-47</guid>
		<description>I'm interested in Stay Alert myself.  Can you send more information and if you know of anyone in Canada that is a distributor? 
Thanks, Kate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m interested in Stay Alert myself.  Can you send more information and if you know of anyone in Canada that is a distributor?<br />
Thanks, Kate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on K5 Tactical - Tactical Hawk-Spike by Lee1959</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/2005/08/k5-tactical-tactical-hawk-spike/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee1959</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2005 00:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/?p=42#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Hmmmmm not sure if that was an insult or not, wordy reply... overly verbose? lol ;) The hazard of the writer I suppose. 

As a neophyte hobbyist knife maker, I know how hard it is to come up with something that actually works as you intend it, that is rugged, and that is eye appealing as well. Your design is clean, well executed, looks to be effective, and is what I prefer most in any tool that might be called upon to save my own old hide, KISS simple. 

To quote Jerimiah Johnson, "You will do well".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmmm not sure if that was an insult or not, wordy reply&#8230; overly verbose? lol <img src='http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> The hazard of the writer I suppose. </p>
<p>As a neophyte hobbyist knife maker, I know how hard it is to come up with something that actually works as you intend it, that is rugged, and that is eye appealing as well. Your design is clean, well executed, looks to be effective, and is what I prefer most in any tool that might be called upon to save my own old hide, KISS simple. </p>
<p>To quote Jerimiah Johnson, &#8220;You will do well&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on K5 Tactical - Tactical Hawk-Spike by Lee1959</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/2005/08/k5-tactical-tactical-hawk-spike/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee1959</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2005 22:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/?p=42#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Eddie, your work is very nice, well finished and executed. And the amount of originality and thought put into your designs are very evident. Few put as much thought into a tool such as the hawk or hachete, as they do knives, except in the primitive area of muzzleloading with makers like Daniel Winkler and others.  

I was not sure about anodized aluminum and cold I still have memories of the old aluminum ice cube trays and wet hands sticking to them, lol, as any kid will remember, they stuck worse than super glue.  

I like the idea of the handles easily removeable for customizing, well done. Wood is hard to beat for such tools but no where near as strong as steel, especialy an integral head and shaft such as your design. Is it diferentially heat treated? Cold and electrical conductivity were my only concerns so something like neoprene or some other wrap being easily done is very slick.  

 As far as wearing gloves constantly, I too wear them all the time, I do love my deerskin gloves, unlined or lined depending on season, they give a great tactile feel, better than any others I have found. I use them for archery as well as shooting sports, driving, working with tools etc.  

My concern was directed for that odd time when they came off for whatever reason, I always try to think of the exception as well as the rule :). 

Overall, I think you have a winner there personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eddie, your work is very nice, well finished and executed. And the amount of originality and thought put into your designs are very evident. Few put as much thought into a tool such as the hawk or hachete, as they do knives, except in the primitive area of muzzleloading with makers like Daniel Winkler and others.  </p>
<p>I was not sure about anodized aluminum and cold I still have memories of the old aluminum ice cube trays and wet hands sticking to them, lol, as any kid will remember, they stuck worse than super glue.  </p>
<p>I like the idea of the handles easily removeable for customizing, well done. Wood is hard to beat for such tools but no where near as strong as steel, especialy an integral head and shaft such as your design. Is it diferentially heat treated? Cold and electrical conductivity were my only concerns so something like neoprene or some other wrap being easily done is very slick.  </p>
<p> As far as wearing gloves constantly, I too wear them all the time, I do love my deerskin gloves, unlined or lined depending on season, they give a great tactile feel, better than any others I have found. I use them for archery as well as shooting sports, driving, working with tools etc.  </p>
<p>My concern was directed for that odd time when they came off for whatever reason, I always try to think of the exception as well as the rule :). </p>
<p>Overall, I think you have a winner there personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on K5 Tactical - Tactical Hawk-Spike by Lee1959</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/2005/08/k5-tactical-tactical-hawk-spike/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee1959</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 23:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalgearreview.com/wordpress/?p=42#comment-23</guid>
		<description>That would definitly be something, it is not just simply a weapon, but a tool also. Me likes much better. I still would want to find out the conductivity of powder coating. That or add a rubber or neoprene grip over the steel and aluminum handle, maybe something like a tool dip. Especially for handling during winter weather, since I live in the cold north, lol, and gripping something like that with a damp hand in below zero would leave palm skin on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would definitly be something, it is not just simply a weapon, but a tool also. Me likes much better. I still would want to find out the conductivity of powder coating. That or add a rubber or neoprene grip over the steel and aluminum handle, maybe something like a tool dip. Especially for handling during winter weather, since I live in the cold north, lol, and gripping something like that with a damp hand in below zero would leave palm skin on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
